THE ONLY SCIENTIFIC, LOGICAL EXPLANATION OF THE WORLD TRADE TOWERS DESTRUCTION

EVERYBODY WITH ANY INTELLIGENCE KNOWS THAT THE U.S. GORVERNMENT ( Perhaps with Israeli Help) SET EXPLOSIVES IN
THE TOWERS - AND BROUGHT THE WORLD TRADE TOWERS DOWN IN COLLAPSE.

NATURALLY THE BUSH - CHANEY - OBAMA GOVERNMENT WILL NOT INVESTIGATE THE ACTUAL NANO-THERMITE EXPLOSIVE FOUND IN THE RUBBLE - NOR WILL THE U.S. GOVERNMENT EVEN TALK TO THE PHYSICISTS WHO HAVE BROUGHT THEM THE EVIDENCE.

AN INVESTIGATION INTO THIS WOULD RESULT IN ARREST, PROSECUTION AND IMPRISONING OF THE BUSH GOVERNMENT, THE OBAMA GOVERNMENT AND MOST OF THE CONGRESS (WHO OBVIOUSLY KNOW ENOUGH PHYSICS TO KNOW THAT THIS HAD TO BE A GOVERNMENT DESTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS AND MURDER OF CITIZENS)

SO EVEN IF YOU BRING CONFORMIST GOVERNMENT SUPPORTERS THE EVIDENCE - THEY WILL SAY ,” IT PROVES NOTHING.” UNLESS YOU FORCE THEM TO FOLLOW THIS LOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF THE EVIDENCE . SO ::

We start with a question in logic to solve :

IF it is proved that the collapse of these buildings could not have happened according to the laws of physics as a result of heat temperatures able to be produced by Jet fuel fires - OR that the impact of the airplanes them selves could not have damaged these buildings to sufficiently weaken them so that ALL 3 of them collapsed into their own footprint -

THEN we must conclude that the official NIST explanation of possible collapse from Either of THESE 2 things: (Weakening of the metal through heat achievable through kerosene fires OR the impact damage of an airplane to the structure) is in error; that is: False.

If we have been able to prove that at least THOSE 2, U.S. Government speculations of how the buildings collapsed violate the laws of physics - we must then look for Other causes of the collapses.

NOW in looking for other causes known to scientific possibility - we must consult an array of authorities on how buildings of such construction Could be brought down in That MANNER. In arriving at this point - one discovers that there are ONLY a FEW OTHER KNOWN POSSIBLE MEANS OF BRINGING SUCH BUILDINGS DOWN IN THE MANNER THAT THEY COLLAPSED DOWN.

A Sophomore might attempt to argue the point of the words “Other KNOWN possible means” - however that objection is easily shown to be illogical - because if one argues ANY point on the bases of there may be an UNKNOWN force that causes something - if such a claim could be employed in Logical argument - then NO argument to establish the proof of ANYTHING could resolve ANY question: As one could say, “Well perhaps an UNKNOWN force causes a car’s motor to work the cylinders and not the explosion of gas vapor - as the gas vapor could just be something “connected” to an UNKNOWN force that causes the cylinders to move. So that specious argument is discredited.

SO - I have to prove FIRST by the evidence gathered that the Towers Could NOT have collapsed due to forces that the Gov. claims collapsed them.

THEN I have to establish that according to the knowledge of all the experts consulted that there are only certain Known forces that could collapse the buildings AS they came down.

THEN - If I establish that there are only certain known forces that could have brought the buildings down at the speed recorded and in such a manner as to fall as rubble in their own footprints - THEN I must establish whether these means So Used were available to the people the government accuses of the crime - or if those means are only available to sophisticated state of the art laboratories.

IF I establish that the only known means by which these buildings could be brought down are available ONLY to *CERTAIN Entities* : either people, organizations or governments, THEN I HAVE ESTABLISHED A LIMITED NUMBER OF ENTITIES THAT COULD HAVE DESTROYED THESE BUILDINGS IN THE MANNER IN WHICH THEY WERE DESTROYED. IF OUR GOVERNMENT RULERS AND OTHER COUNTRIES OR GROUPS ARE THOSE *ONLY* ‘ENTITIES’ TO WHOM - THE RANGE OF POSSIBLE MEANS WERE AVAILABLE - THEN > 9/11 HAS LED TO THEM. THE ONLY QUESTION REMAINING THEN WILL BE *HOW* THOSE ONLY PEOPLE TO WHOM THE MEANS WERE AVAILABLE DID IT.

NO ONE YET KNOWS THE *HOW* .

EXAMPLE:: IF YOU ARE LOCKED IN A ROOM, TIED TO A CHAIR AND ANOTHER PERSON IS ALSO LOCKED IN THE SAME ROOM, TIED TO A CHAIR. BUT YOU ARE THE ONLY ONE WHO STILL HAS ARMS CONNECTED TO HIS BODY - AND THERE IS A KNIFE ON THE FLOOR - AND WE RETURN TO FIND THE OTHER PERSON DEAD WITH A KNIFE IN HIM . AND WE KNOW THAT THE ROOM WAS UNENTERABLE BY OTHERS AND THAT ONLY THE 2 OF YOU WERE THERE: THEN THERE IS NO DOUBT ABOUT *WHO* IS THE ONLY PERSON WHO COULD HAVE COMMITTED THE CRIME. BUT WE STILL DON’T KNOW *HOW* YOU DID IT. FINDING THE *HOW* IS WHAT MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED AFTER WE FIND THE ONLY POSSIBLE “WHO” s .

IF - JUST IF - I AM ABLE TO ESTABLISH THAT THE ACCUSED HIJACKERS BY FLYING PLANES INTO THESE BUILDINGS COULD NOT HAVE CAUSED THE MANNER OF COLLAPSE THAT THESE BUILDINGS SUFFERED - THEN THAT WOULD ESTABLISH THAT THE WHOLE OF THE 2 INVASION WARS THE U.S. HAS LAUNCHED WERE UNJUST AND A HOAX ON BOTH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THOSE THAT AMERICAN SOLDIERS MASSACRED.

((FOR IF ONLY A FEW FLOORS OF THESE BUILDINGS HAD BEEN DAMAGED AND ONLY 30 OR 40 PEOPLE HAD BEEN KILLED - THE DIRECTORS OF THIS NATION WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET THE AGREEMENT OF THE PEOPLE TO LAUNCH FULL SCALE WARS - AS THE CONGRESS WOULD NOT HAVE DARED TO DO SO OPENLY WITHOUT THE CAUSE OF A LARGE CATASTROPHE.))

THEN IF THE *HIJACKERS* NON-RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE BUILDING’S COLLAPSES IS ESTABLISHED, THEN - WE *ALL* HAVE A PROBLEM: BOTH WE WHO WERE USED FOR THE WARS HAVE A PROBLEM - AND ANY OF THOSE WHO MIGHT BE GUILTY OF HAVING DECEIVED AND USED US HAVE A PROBLEM.

WE THEN HAVE A PROBLEM BECAUSE IF WE *DO* PROVE THAT:: THEN THOSE WHO DID BRING DOWN THE BUILDINGS WILL HAVE TO ATTACK *US*, WHO KNOW THAT THEY DID IN ORDER TO SURVIVE PUNISHMENT FROM US. THE PROBLEM IS CAUSED BY THE FACT THAT THOSE SUSPECTS ARE THE GROUP WITH ALL THE POWER. SO WE WILL HAVE A PROBLEM THERE.

THAT IS THE LOGICAL PROGRESSION:: NOW TO BEGIN PRESENTING THE EVIDENCE FIRST OF HOW THE COLLAPSE OF THESE BUILDINGS COULD *NOT* HAVE HAPPENED.

danish scientist Niels Harrit, on nano-thermite in the WTC < This establishes that Explosives were used in the Demolition of the WTC

1.) Free fall speed Formula
Free Fall Time = the Sguare Rt of Dist. divided by 16
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7ACXRGROK4
THE ABOVE Establishes that the WTC could not have fallen at near free fall speed w/out Expolives

2.)Another Freefall impossibility proof. Another proof that the Principle of Conservation of Momentum
would not have made a Building collapse at that near free-fall speed possible.
http://911blimp.net/prf_FreeFallPhysics.shtml

3.) The free-fall formula proof again: proving the impossibility of nea rfreefall speed w/out Explosives
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/W7Kuttler.pdf

4.)The Novas Pancake Theory of WTC proved to be nonsense.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdQh18kvpRU

5.)The Finale of Architect Richard Gage's
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50Mm3ASwRTw
references to Andreus Von Bulow formerTechnology & Defense minister of
Germany.

FOR THOSE WHO JUST WANT THE SCIENCE ON BLDG 7 - Why it had to be Explosives
David Chandler
6.)World Trade Center 7: An Engineered Collapse Part 16/19
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KZ1jkJKTIM (#1)

David Chandler
7.)World Trade Center 7: An Engineered Collapse Part 17/19
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jFzBJTqz6s (#2)

Kevin Ryan at Keene State College utube
8.)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj_NNwjkY5w The metal strength
Don’t know if this is the full lecture. If not it is findable on google.

9.)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8W-t57xnZg part 1 of MIT engineer lecture 911

10.)Conclusion of the MIT professors WTC lecture (Part 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qW81Cd7nNH8
www.youtube.com

11.) John Gross lead engineer of NIST Denies Molten Metal that is witnessed and photographed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyTXNe9gAkk

12.)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJSCtR-R9oQ
AE 9/11 Truth Conference Ending Feb 19, 2010
You will have to Youtube the REST of this to observe the logical physics referenced in
the Conference .
Geo Orwell said: " If you can keep alive your mind during Dark Times, then you can keep alive
theSECRET DOCTRINE that: 2 + 2 = 4 ".

And so WE can keep Alive the TRUTH of PHYSICS "THAT IF A STEEL STRUCTURE FALLS AT NEAR 'FREE FALL-SPEED', THEN IT **CAN NOT ** ! HAVE 'PANCAKED' DOWN: BECAUSE EACH PANCAKE FLOOR **SLOWS** THE MOMENTUM OF THE FALL MAKING NEAR "FREE FALL-SPEED" IMPOSSIBLE **UNLESS** THE FLOOR-SUPPORTS ARE DEMOLISHED BY EXPLOSIVE DEMOLITION.


13.)http://physics911.net < Science Site for 9/11

Journalist Barrie Zwicker STATES that the Evidence of HOW the WTC came down LEADS Directly to the BUSH-CHANEY administration and THEIR Associates.
Barrie Zwicker with Former MI5 Whistleblower Annie Machon Pt 4-5
14.)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzkr26gTsck

15.)http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/

A little humor to lighten this observational study up.
9 11 The Whole World Knows Even The French Get It ( 1) (9/11 TRUTH SERIES) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xI5l55p2s-o

Physicist Steven Jones : 9/11 Symposium 11/03/07
Proving WTC: Free fall & pancake both impossible from plane impacts.
16.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMhl-S5MyAc

The Security Shut down in the Towers when anyone could go in and out.
17.)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1P1vb0KrDowww.youtube.com
www.youtube.com

18.)http://www.salem-news.com/articles/march022010/rtv-911-tk.php

19.)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssuAMNas1us Gage on reg news show.

20.)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oO2yT0uBQbM Gage Fresno TV

21.)David Ray Griffin calls Obama a liar re:911
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IoFW_yXGGfk

22.) http://www.salem-news.com/articles/march022010/rtv-911-tk.php
Kirjoitettu noin 2 viikkoa sitten · Kommentoi · En tykkääkäänTykkää
Sinä, John Milich ja Gottfried Dernbecher tykkäätte tästä.
Kirjoita kommentti...
Näytä lisää muistiinpanoja
Käyttäjän Evlynar muistiinpanot

THERE IS A PROBLEM WITH THE LEADERSHIP OF 9/11TRUTH ON ALL WEBSITES.5. huhtikuuta 2010

WHAT WILL RESULT IF THE PRESS IS FORCED TO AIR THE 9/11 ANALYTICAL SCIENCE ?27. maaliskuuta 2010

THE ONLY SCIENTIFIC, LOGICAL EXPLANATION OF THE WORLD TRADE TOWERS DESTRUCTION31. maaliskuuta 2010

YESHUA AND JAMES10. maaliskuuta 2010

HEALTH - LIES THAT THE U.S. MEDIA MISINFORMATION TELL YOU ABOUT IT. Johanson NOTES24. helmikuuta 2010

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdcwwE_2Y3417. helmikuuta 2010

A FABLE OF THE SECOND COMING17. helmikuuta 2010

MUSIC LINKS26. maaliskuuta 2010

WORD for WORD Text of UN RESOLUTION 24231. tammikuuta 2010

THE REST OF THE GUANTANAMO 'SUICIDE' REPORT THAT THE 'WALL' ONLY ALLOWED ME TO 'MENTION'22. tammikuuta 2010